National Partnership for Women & Families

Monthly Women's Health Research Review

Study assesses psychosocial factors and women's psychological health prior to receiving abortion care

Summary of "Psychosocial factors and pre-abortion psychological health: The significance of stigma," Steinberg et al., Social Science & Medicine, Dec. 12, 2015.

"Most research in the area of abortion and mental health has focused on the mental health of women after an abortion," though "research consistently finds that depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms are higher just before abortion compared to anytime afterwards," according to Julia Steinberg of the University of Maryland College Park and colleagues.

Moreover, they explained that "pre-abortion mental health influences coping with the abortion experience ..., and it is the strongest predictor of post-abortion mental health." As a result, "understanding what influences pre-abortion mental health may help women cope effectively, and such an understanding may help promote mental health before and after an abortion," the researchers wrote.

For the study, the researchers used three conceptual frameworks -- "a common risk-factors approach," "a stress and coping perspective" and a "sociocultural framework" -- "to examine predictors of pre-abortion psychological health."

The common risk factors approach asserts "that the correlation between abortion and subsequent mental health is spurious, and driven by factors that are common -- e.g., pre-existing mental health problems, violence, social disadvantage -- among women having abortions and women having mental health problems," the researchers wrote. They noted, "Studies using this approach find that abortion is not associated with worse subsequent mental health problems when these confounding factors are considered in analyses." The researchers "hypothesized that more frequent [intimate partner violence], reproductive coercion and more childhood adversities would be associated with poorer post-abortion psychological health."

According to the researchers, "The stress and coping perspective ... argues that if an individual perceives a situation as stressful, then coping mechanisms are enacted and these coping mechanisms lead to better or worse psychological health." The researchers hypothesized that a woman's pre-abortion psychological health would be poorer "the sooner [she] desired a future pregnancy (which signals something must be amiss to be having an abortion)" and "the less serious and intimate [she] is with her partner (which may be telling of how supportive her partner is)."

The researchers explained that "the sociocultural framework contends that the sociocultural context such as societal stigma influences post-abortion psychological adjustment by influencing how stressful women perceive an abortion and how they cope with this experience." Citing research showing that women in the United States experience abortion stigma, the researchers "included perceived abortion stigma as a possible contributor to pre-abortion psychological health, hypothesizing that the more a woman expected abortion stigma, the poorer her pre-abortion psychological health."

According to the researchers, the study's primary objective "was to examine which, of a variety of psychological factors -- childhood adversities, adverse experience with an intimate partner, relationship context, pregnancy desires, and perceived abortion stigma -- were independently associated with pre-abortion mental health."

Methods

For the study, the researchers recruited women at three abortion clinics who were seeking abortion care because of an unintended pregnancy between July 2012 and February 2013. Participants had to be at least 18 years old.

Women willing to participate were asked to respond to survey questions at two points during their visit to the clinic: once prior to contraceptive counseling and once after the counseling. Due to differences in clinic flow, women at two of the clinics completed the second part of the survey before their abortion while women at the third clinic completed the survey after their abortion.

The researchers assessed participants' "future pregnancy desires, relationship context, recent adverse experiences with an intimate partner, childhood adversities, perceived abortion stigma, depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms, sociodemographic factors, type of abortion procedure, and trimester of abortion."

Findings

The researchers included 353 women in their final analysis after excluding several women for a variety of reasons, such as incomplete survey responses. The researchers noted, "For each of the predictors and outcomes in this study, [they] compared the 353 women used in the analysis to those of ... 134 excluded women who were not missing on each measure." Overall, "[s]ample sizes ranged from 63 to 123, with all but two of the measures (perceived abortion stigma and type of abortion procedure) having data on over 100 of the 134 excluded women," the researchers wrote.

In terms of sociodemographic factors, the researchers found that:

  • 60 percent of the 353 participants were ages 20 to 29;
  • 74.4 percent were women of color;
  • 76.8 percent did not have a college degree;
  • 64.3 percent had annual household incomes under $10,000; and
  • 77.1 percent had never been married.

Regarding abortion characteristics, the researchers found that most of the 353 participants had a surgical abortion (68.8 percent) and sought abortion care in the first trimester (93.4 percent).

The researchers also found, in terms of childhood adversities:

  • 55.8 percent of the 353 participants reported low economic status;
  • 50 percent reported psychological abuse;
  • 38.8 percent said they grew up with someone who had a substance use disorder;
  • 34.8 percent grew up with someone who was depressed or anxious;
  • 31.7 percent reported physical abuse;
  • 25.0 percent grew up with a father figure who acted violently toward their mother;
  • 17.8 percent grew up in a house where someone went to prison; and
  • 13 percent reported sexual abuse.

Overall, according to the researchers, 62.3 percent of the 353 participants said they experienced at least two of the eight childhood adversities.

Regarding recent adverse experiences with an intimate partner, the researchers found:

  • 34.6 percent of the 353 participants reported experiencing recent verbal violence;
  • 11.9 percent reported experiencing pregnancy coercion;
  • 7.4 percent reported experiencing recent physical violence;
  • 7.4 percent reported recent contraception sabotage by a partner; and
  • 4.8 percent reported experiencing recent sexual abuse from an intimate partner.

The researchers found that the mean score for participants' depressive symptoms, based on the Center for Epidemiological Study Depression Scale, was 23.4. Relatedly, the researchers found that the mean score for participants' anxiety and stress symptoms -- both based on the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale -- were 7.9 and 12.4, respectively. According to the researchers, all three scores "were comparable to previous research assessing psychological health among women just before having an abortion." The researchers noted that younger women "had more depressive ... and anxiety symptoms," while those who had at least some college education "had more stress symptoms than those with a high school education or less." The researchers also found that women who had medication abortion "had more pre-abortion anxiety symptoms than those having a surgical abortion."

Regarding psychosocial factors and psychological health, the researchers found that the "more childhood adversities" a woman experienced, "the more pre-abortion depressive ..., anxiety ..., and stress symptoms" she reported. Similarly, "the more often women experienced intimate partner violence or reproductive coercion the more pre-abortion depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms women reported," the researchers wrote. According to the researchers, the less a woman spoke to her intimate partner about "things that really mattered," the more she experienced "pre-abortion depressive and stress symptoms." A woman also reported more depressive and stress symptoms the "less amount of time in which [she] desired a future pregnancy," the researchers found. They also found that "[p]erceiving more abortion stigma was strongly associated with more pre-abortion depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms."

When assessing the information via a hierarchical linear regression model, the researchers found that the "total amount of variance explained by all the predictors" -- including "sociodemographics, abortion characteristics, number of childhood adversities, adverse experiences with an intimate partner, relationship context factors, future pregnancy desires, and perceived abortion stigma" -- on depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms "was 32.0% of depressive symptoms, 30.1% of anxiety symptoms, and 27.7% of stress symptoms." They noted, "Perceived abortion stigma, which was entered last, explained the most total additional variance for both depressive and stress symptoms," adding 13.2 percent to the total variance of depressive symptoms and 10.7 percent to the total variance of stress symptoms. It also "explained the second most additional total variance in anxiety symptoms, an additional 9.6%," the researchers wrote.

They noted, "In order to further examine whether perceived abortion stigma seemed to explain the most additional variance when entered last in the regression analysis, we also ran models in which we entered each of the other four types of psychosocial factors -- childhood adversities, adverse experiences with intimate partner, relationship context, and pregnancy desires -- last." When the researchers added in childhood adversity last, they found that it "seemed to account for the next highest amount of total variance," accounting for 4.5 percent of the variance in depressive symptoms, 5.7 percent of the variance in anxiety symptoms and 3.6 percent of the variance in stress symptoms.

According to the researchers, "The other factor that explained a large proportion of total variance was number of childhood adversities, which explained 10.4%, 10.8%, and 8.3% of the total variance in depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms, respectively."

The researchers wrote that in the study's final model, "significant predictors of depressive symptoms were: age, education (high school or less versus at least some college), total number of childhood adversities, intimate partner violence, and perceived abortion stigma." Specifically, they found that women tended to have more pre-abortion depressive symptoms if they were younger, had some college education, had a higher number of childhood adversities, more frequently experienced intimate partner violence and perceived more abortion stigma. According to the researchers, "Pre-abortion anxiety and stress symptoms had the same predictors in the same direction with the exception of the predictor of intimate partner violence, which was not associated with either of these in final models." Rather, women reported more pre-abortion anxiety and stress symptoms "the more often [they experienced] reproductive coercion in the past six months."

Discussion

"While various factors independently predicted pre-abortion psychological health, perceived abortion stigma appeared to explain the most amount of additional variance in depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms after all other predictors were entered," the researchers wrote. According the researchers, the findings that showed that "[t]he association between abortion stigma and pre-abortion depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms was strong and highly significant" indicate "that helping women feel less stigmatized about having an abortion may be important for lowering pre-abortion depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms." Moreover, the finding that "pre-abortion psychological health was the strongest predictor of post-abortion psychological health ... also suggest[s] that abortion stigma is a large contributor to post-abortion psychological health," the researchers wrote, noting that, as a result, "reducing abortion stigma may also promote post-abortion mental health."

The researchers explained that other factors contributing "to pre-abortion psychological health were number of childhood adversities, age and education, with more adversities, younger age and higher education predicting more pre-abortion depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms." Further, "experiencing more frequent reproductive coercion predicted more pre-abortion anxiety and stress symptoms, while experiencing more frequent intimate partner violence predicted more pre-abortion depressive symptoms," they wrote, noting that that the study was the first "to show reproductive coercion relates to mental health."

According to the researchers, the levels of depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms found among pre-abortion women in the study "are similar to other samples of women just about to receive an abortion," but they are "elevated relative to other samples." For example, they noted that "women of similar demographics not just about to have an abortion" had a lower mean score on the depressive measure, while a sample of U.S. adults and a sample of post-partum women had lower scores on the anxiety and stress scales. The researchers wrote, "The elevated levels of depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms pre-abortion compared to other (similar) samples suggests that understanding what contributes to pre-abortion psychological health is warranted."

Noting that "pre-abortion psychological health has consistently been shown to be a strong predictor of post-abortion psychological health," the authors contended that "helping women reduce pre-abortion psychological distress is important and to do that, we need to understand what predicts pre-abortion psychological health." They recommended that further research examine "other potential predictors such as attitudes and feelings towards abortion, partner support more directly, and the abortion decision-making process among women."

The researchers added that the study's findings on the role of perceived abortion stigma on variance in pre-abortion psychological health "suggest more research adopting the sociocultural perspective, which considers the sociopolitical climate of the abortion, to examine the relationship between abortion and subsequent mental health would be fruitful." They concluded that "reducing abortion stigma may promote mental health before an abortion."

Video Round Up

Broadly shares a behind-the-scenes clip from "Across the Line," a virtual reality documentary that uses video and audio recordings from antiabortion-rights protests at U.S. clinics to show viewers what many women experience when trying to access abortion care.

Video Round Up

In this clip, RTV6's Katie Heinz discusses a new social medial campaign launched in reaction to a harmful Indiana law (HB 1337) that bans abortion care based on the sex of the fetus or a fetal disability diagnosis, among other restrictions.

Video Round Up

In this clip, Fox 17 News' Michele DeSelms covers legislation (HB 4787, HB 4830) passed last week in the Michigan House that would penalize individuals who coerce a woman into receiving an abortion.

Video Round Up

In part of a longer clip covering multiple topics, Reuters TV reports on an omnibus antiabortion-rights measure (HB 1411) recently signed into law by Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) that bars local health departments from distributing funds for non-abortion-related care to organizations affiliated with abortion providers, among several other provisions.

Video Round Up

WTVF's Chris Conte reports on the outcome of a Tennessee House subcommittee hearing, which advanced one antiabortion-rights bill while deferring or withdrawing several others.

Video Round Up

In this clip, Los Angeles Times reporter Molly Hennessy-Fiske hears from Kristeena Banda -- a clinic administrator at Whole Woman's Health, an abortion clinic in McAllen, Texas -- about what is at stake in a legal challenge to parts of Texas' omnibus antiabortion-rights law (HB 2).

Video Round Up

13 News WOWK reporter Alyssa Meisner interviews several women in West Virginia about Nurx, a smartphone application that helps women access birth control.

Video Round Up

In a segment on HB 2, comedian Samantha Bee interviews Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, and Texas Rep. Dan Flynn (R), one of the bill's authors, for TBS' "Full Frontal with Samantha Bee," Vox reports.

Video Round Up

John Oliver on HBO's "Last Week Tonight with John Oliver" discusses the proliferation of attacks on abortion rights in the United States and comments on how such restrictions affect a woman's access to abortion care.

Video Round Up

MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell hears from Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, about oral arguments before the Supreme Court in a case challenging provisions of Texas' omnibus antiabortion-rights law (HB 2).

See All

Datapoints

This map, from Bloomberg Business, highlights the rapid decline in abortion access in the United States since 2011.

Datapoints

These maps, compiled using data from the New York Times and the Guttmacher Institute, underscore findings from a recent Times investigation, including that there were more than 700,000 searches for how to self-induce an abortion in 2015.

Datapoints

This chart, compiled by NPR, shows how the majority of countries affected by the Zika virus, which might be linked to a severe birth defect, curb access to contraception and abortion care.

Datapoints

In this map, Center for American Progress' "ThinkProgress" spotlights the 12 states that have cleared Planned Parenthood of any wrongdoing after launching investigations into the organization.

Datapoints

In its latest report card, the Population Institute provides a snapshot of the condition of reproductive rights and health in each state in 2015.

Datapoints

The Guttmacher Institute in this graph shows the rapid increase in the number of state abortion restrictions over the past few years.

Datapoints

In this map, the Kaiser Family Foundation shows how widely abortion coverage varies from state to state in insurance plans sold through the Affordable Care Act's (PL 111-148) insurance marketplaces.

Datapoints

This infographic, released with a new Guttmacher Institute study, shows the increase in use of long-acting reversible contraception among U.S. women between 2002 and 2012.

Datapoints

This map, released with a study from the University of Michigan Health System, shows how an increasing number of state Medicaid programs over the last three years are providing reimbursement for immediate postpartum LARC provision.

Datapoints

In this infographic, the Guttmacher Institute shows how the proportion of uninsured reproductive-age women in the U.S. declined from 17.9% in 2013 to 13.9% in 2014, the first year in which the Affordable Care Act was implemented fully.

See All

At a Glance

"A woman's ability to end her pregnancy too often depends on where she lives, her age and how much money is in her pocket."

— Marcela Howell of In Our Own Voice: National Black Women's Reproductive Justice Agenda, discussing ongoing disparities in women's access to abortion care on the 43rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

At a Glance

"If women are not free to make decisions about their own lives and health, they are not free. And if women are not free, none of us are."

— Abortion provider Warren Hern, in a STAT News opinion piece on why he continues to offer abortion care despite receiving harassment and death threats throughout his 42-year career.

At a Glance

"Not since before Roe v. Wade has a law or court decision had the potential to devastate access to reproductive health care on such a sweeping scale."

— Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, on a ruling from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld major portions of a Texas antiabortion-rights law.